You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Promoting competitiveness of neglected and underutilized crop species: comparative analysis of nutritional composition of indigenous and exotic leafy and fruit vegetables in Ghana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10722-014-0162-x |
| Authors |
D. Nyadanu, S. T. Lowor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,727,902
of 25,081,419 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#125
of 795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,821
of 242,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them