You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-007-0160-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diana Burgess, Michelle van Ryn, John Dovidio, Somnath Saha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 64% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Comoros | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 476 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 70 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 14% |
| Researcher | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 9% |
| Other | 106 | 21% |
| Unknown | 87 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 113 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 74 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 50 | 10% |
| Unknown | 108 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 193. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#206,397
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#176
of 8,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288
of 90,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.