↓ Skip to main content

When trends intersect: The challenge of protecting freshwater ecosystems under multiple land use and hydrological intensification scenarios

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When trends intersect: The challenge of protecting freshwater ecosystems under multiple land use and hydrological intensification scenarios
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny Davis, Anthony P. O'Grady, Allan Dale, Angela H. Arthington, Peter A. Gell, Patrick D. Driver, Nick Bond, Michelle Casanova, Max Finlayson, Robyn J. Watts, Samantha J. Capon, Ivan Nagelkerken, Reid Tingley, Brian Fry, Timothy J. Page, Alison Specht

Abstract

Intensification of the use of natural resources is a world-wide trend driven by the increasing demand for water, food, fibre, minerals and energy. These demands are the result of a rising world population, increasing wealth and greater global focus on economic growth. Land use intensification, together with climate change, is also driving intensification of the global hydrological cycle. Both processes will have major socio-economic and ecological implications for global water availability. In this paper we focus on the implications of land use intensification for the conservation and management of freshwater ecosystems using Australia as an example. We consider this in the light of intensification of the hydrologic cycle due to climate change, and associated hydrological scenarios that include the occurrence of more intense hydrological events (extreme storms, larger floods and longer droughts). We highlight the importance of managing water quality, the value of providing environmental flows within a watershed framework and the critical role that innovative science and adaptive management must play in developing proactive and robust responses to intensification. We also suggest research priorities to support improved systemic governance, including adaptation planning and management to maximise freshwater biodiversity outcomes while supporting the socio-economic objectives driving land use intensification. Further research priorities include: i) determining the relative contributions of surface water and groundwater in supporting freshwater ecosystems; ii) identifying and protecting freshwater biodiversity hotspots and refugia; iii) improving our capacity to model hydro-ecological relationships and predict ecological outcomes from land use intensification and climate change; iv) developing an understanding of long term ecosystem behaviour; and v) exploring systemic approaches to enhancing governance systems, including planning and management systems affecting freshwater outcomes. A major policy challenge will be the integration of land and water management, which increasingly are being considered within different policy frameworks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 373 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 20%
Researcher 77 20%
Student > Master 47 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 5%
Other 58 15%
Unknown 85 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 126 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 16%
Engineering 28 7%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 4%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 103 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,173,443
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#9,346
of 30,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,266
of 279,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#48
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.