↓ Skip to main content

Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
269 news outlets
blogs
44 blogs
twitter
654 X users
facebook
73 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
44 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
7 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
533 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
811 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds
Published in
Science, April 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.1261022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miho Nagasawa, Shouhei Mitsui, Shiori En, Nobuyo Ohtani, Mitsuaki Ohta, Yasuo Sakuma, Tatsushi Onaka, Kazutaka Mogi, Takefumi Kikusui

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 654 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 811 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Japan 5 <1%
Austria 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 772 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 147 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 123 15%
Student > Master 108 13%
Researcher 107 13%
Student > Postgraduate 36 4%
Other 134 17%
Unknown 156 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 206 25%
Psychology 107 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 46 6%
Neuroscience 46 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 5%
Other 170 21%
Unknown 194 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2948. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,303
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Science
#129
of 83,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12
of 263,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#1
of 1,311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.