↓ Skip to main content

Distributional Vowel Training Is Less Effective for Adults than for Infants. A Study Using the Mismatch Response

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distributional Vowel Training Is Less Effective for Adults than for Infants. A Study Using the Mismatch Response
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0109806
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Wanrooij, Paul Boersma, Titia L. van Zuijen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 10 28%
Psychology 10 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,269,439
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,669
of 194,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,976
of 254,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,420
of 5,263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.