↓ Skip to main content

Pseudovibrio hongkongensis sp. nov., isolated from a marine flatworm

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pseudovibrio hongkongensis sp. nov., isolated from a marine flatworm
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10482-015-0470-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Xu, Qi Li, Renmao Tian, Qiliang Lai, Yu Zhang

Abstract

A Gram-negative, motile, rod-shaped bacterial strain, designated UST20140214-015B(T), was isolated from a marine flatworm (Polyclad). The bacterium was found to be Gram-negative, oxidase and catalase positive, long-rod shaped, and motile by means of several peritrichous or subpolar flagella. Strain UST20140214-015B(T) grew optimally at 28 °C, at pH 7.0 and in the presence of 3 % (w/v) NaCl. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain UST20140214-015B(T) belongs to the genus Pseudovibrio, with highest sequence similarity to Pseudovibrio japonicus WSF2(T) (96.9 %), followed by P. ascidiaceicola F423(T) (96.7 %), P. denitrificans DN34(T) (96.6 %), P. axinellae Ad2(T) (96.3 %). All the other species shared <95.5 % sequence similarity. The principal fatty acids were identified as summed feature 8 (C18:1 ω7c/ω6c, as defined by the MIDI system; 70.8 %), C16:0 (9.1 %), summed feature 3 (C16:1 ω6c/C16:1 ω7c; 5.7 %). The G+C content of the chromosomal DNA was determined to be 53.3 mol%. The combined genotypic and phenotypic data show that strain UST20140214-015B(T) represents a novel species within the genus Pseudovibrio, for which the name Pseudovibrio hongkongensis sp. nov. is proposed, with the type strain UST20140214-015B(T) (=KCTC 42383(T) = MCCC 1K00451(T)).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Other 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 20%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,273,512
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1,738
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,169
of 264,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#48
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.