You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk of ovarian carcinoma and consumption of vitamins A, C, and E and specific carotenoids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer (0008543X), January 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1002/1097-0142(20011101)92:9<2318::aid-cncr1578>3.0.co;2-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen M. Fairfield, Susan E. Hankinson, Bernard A. Rosner, David J. Hunter, Graham A. Colditz, Walter C. Willett |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,798,066
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#3,124
of 14,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,777
of 114,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#30
of 578 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 578 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.