↓ Skip to main content

Back from the dead; the curious tale of the predatory cyanobacterium Vampirovibrio chlorellavorus

Overview of attention for article published in PeerJ, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
39 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Back from the dead; the curious tale of the predatory cyanobacterium Vampirovibrio chlorellavorus
Published in
PeerJ, May 2015
DOI 10.7717/peerj.968
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rochelle M. Soo, Ben J. Woodcroft, Donovan H. Parks, Gene W. Tyson, Philip Hugenholtz

Abstract

An uncultured non-photosynthetic basal lineage of the Cyanobacteria, the Melainabacteria, was recently characterised by metagenomic analyses of aphotic environmental samples. However, a predatory bacterium, Vampirovibrio chlorellavorus, originally described in 1972 appears to be the first cultured representative of the Melainabacteria based on a 16S rRNA sequence recovered from a lyophilised co-culture of the organism. Here, we sequenced the genome of V. chlorellavorus directly from 36 year-old lyophilised material that could not be resuscitated confirming its identity as a member of the Melainabacteria. We identified attributes in the genome that likely allow V. chlorellavorus to function as an obligate predator of the microalga Chlorella vulgaris, and predict that it is the first described predator to use an Agrobacterium tumefaciens-like conjugative type IV secretion system to invade its host. V. chlorellavorus is the first cyanobacterium recognised to have a predatory lifestyle and further supports the assertion that Melainabacteria are non-photosynthetic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 144 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 24%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 7%
Environmental Science 8 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 32 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#701,897
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#693
of 15,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,990
of 281,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#18
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.