↓ Skip to main content

Cancer patients’ knowledge about their disease and treatment before, during and after treatment: a prospective, longitudinal study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer patients’ knowledge about their disease and treatment before, during and after treatment: a prospective, longitudinal study
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-4164-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ola Berger, Bjørn Henning Grønberg, Jon Håvard Loge, Stein Kaasa, Kari Sand

Abstract

Knowledge about disease and treatment is necessary before patients can consent to treatment. One of the few established instruments for evaluating whether sufficient information has been provided, is the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire which was developed to measure how patients perceive information. The aim of this study was to investigate whether cancer patients' level of knowledge about their disease and treatment was associated with their perception of and satisfaction with the information. Breast cancer patients referred for adjuvant chemotherapy and prostate cancer patients referred for curative radiotherapy were included. Level of knowledge about their disease and treatment was measured using study-specific questionnaires. Patients' perception of and satisfaction with the received information was assessed using EORTC QLQ-INFO25. Assessments were done before the first consultation with an oncologist (T1), after the consultation (T2) and 8 weeks after start of treatment (T3). Ninety eight patients were enrolled. Patients with higher education, daily Internet access and in paid employment had the highest baseline knowledge scores. The mean knowledge score increased significantly (T1: 16.4; T2: 20.8; T3: 21.3; p < 0.001.). During the same period, the patients reported on the INFO25 a significant, positive increase in how much information they had received, and that they were more satisfied with the information. Patients' knowledge increased significantly during the study period, and they reported that they felt better informed and were more satisfied with the information, suggesting that EORTC QLQ-INFO25 might be used to evaluate cancer patients' level of knowledge about their disease and treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01699672 . Date of registration: September 21, 2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 4 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 42 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Psychology 7 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 44 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,604,390
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,467
of 8,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,654
of 329,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#147
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.