↓ Skip to main content

Abstracts

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Heart Failure, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Abstracts
Published in
European Journal of Heart Failure, May 2015
DOI 10.1002/ejhf.277
Pubmed ID
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Computer Science 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,142,437
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#1,351
of 2,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,965
of 272,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.