↓ Skip to main content

Future CO2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure

Overview of attention for article published in Science, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
16 blogs
policy
12 policy sources
twitter
164 X users
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
1022 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1077 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Future CO2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure
Published in
Science, September 2010
DOI 10.1126/science.1188566
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J. Davis, Ken Caldeira, H. Damon Matthews

Abstract

Slowing climate change requires overcoming inertia in political, technological, and geophysical systems. Of these, only geophysical warming commitment has been quantified. We estimated the commitment to future emissions and warming represented by existing carbon dioxide-emitting devices. We calculated cumulative future emissions of 496 (282 to 701 in lower- and upper-bounding scenarios) gigatonnes of CO2 from combustion of fossil fuels by existing infrastructure between 2010 and 2060, forcing mean warming of 1.3 degrees C (1.1 degrees to 1.4 degrees C) above the pre-industrial era and atmospheric concentrations of CO2 less than 430 parts per million. Because these conditions would likely avoid many key impacts of climate change, we conclude that sources of the most threatening emissions have yet to be built. However, CO2-emitting infrastructure will expand unless extraordinary efforts are undertaken to develop alternatives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,077 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 2%
United Kingdom 11 1%
Germany 8 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Other 11 1%
Unknown 1010 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 239 22%
Researcher 179 17%
Student > Master 140 13%
Student > Bachelor 90 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 5%
Other 204 19%
Unknown 171 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 166 15%
Engineering 137 13%
Chemistry 107 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 81 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 5%
Other 303 28%
Unknown 229 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 389. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#80,069
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,790
of 83,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151
of 105,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#4
of 371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.