You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of MEMS Microneedles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10544-005-6171-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Ai Ling Teo, Christopher Shearwood, Kian Chye Ng, Jia Lu, Shabbir Moochhala |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
| Engineering | 11 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2010.
All research outputs
#7,556,475
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#237
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,967
of 60,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.