You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiple threats, or multiplying the threats? Interactions between invasive predators and other ecological disturbances
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.013 |
| Authors |
Tim S. Doherty, Chris R. Dickman, Dale G. Nimmo, Euan G. Ritchie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 18 | 32% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 2% |
| Christmas Island | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 67% |
| Scientists | 18 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 373 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 69 | 18% |
| Researcher | 54 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 12% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Unknown | 77 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 158 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 102 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 90 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 316. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#109,056
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#60
of 6,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,300
of 287,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.