↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary and climatic factors affecting tooth size in the red foxVulpes vulpes in the Holarctic

Overview of attention for article published in Mammal Research, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolutionary and climatic factors affecting tooth size in the red foxVulpes vulpes in the Holarctic
Published in
Mammal Research, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/bf03195193
Authors

Elwira Szuma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 109 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 61%
Environmental Science 21 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Social Sciences 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 15 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,732,181
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Research
#239
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,065
of 313,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Research
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.