↓ Skip to main content

Greater number of group identifications is associated with lower odds of being depressed: evidence from a Scottish community sample

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Greater number of group identifications is associated with lower odds of being depressed: evidence from a Scottish community sample
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00127-015-1076-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Sani, Vishnu Madhok, Michael Norbury, Pat Dugard, Juliet R. H. Wakefield

Abstract

Group identification has been shown to be associated with reduced risk of depression, but this research has important limitations. Our aim was to establish a robust link between group identification and depression whilst overcoming previous studies' shortcomings. 1824 participants, recruited from General Practice throughout Scotland, completed a questionnaire measuring their identification with three groups (family, community, and a group of their choice), as well as their intensity of contact with each group. They also completed a self-rated depression measure and provided demographic information. Their medical records were also accessed to determine if they had been prescribed antidepressants in the previous 6 months. The number of group identifications was associated with both lower self-rated depression and lower odds of having received a prescription for antidepressants, even after controlling for the number of contact-intensive groups, level of education, gender, age, and relationship status. Identifying with multiple groups may help to protect individuals against depression. This highlights the potential importance of social prescriptions, where health professionals encourage a depressed patient to become a member of one or more groups with which the patient believes he/she would be likely to identify.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 116 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 37 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2021.
All research outputs
#631,083
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#96
of 2,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,078
of 280,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.