↓ Skip to main content

Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry

Overview of attention for article published in Calcified Tissue International, December 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry
Published in
Calcified Tissue International, December 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf02409456
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Mazess, Walter W. Peppler, Charles H. Chesnut, Wil B. Nelp, Stanton H. Cohn, Italo Zanzi

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2001.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#553
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,383
of 30,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.