You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phage-display libraries of murine and human antibody Fab fragments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Biotechnology, December 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02761708 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Engberg, Peter Sejer Andersen, Leif Kofoed Nielsen, Morten Dziegiel, Lene K. Johansen, Bjarne Albrechtsen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,836,890
of 23,057,470 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biotechnology
#96
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,878
of 92,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biotechnology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,057,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them