↓ Skip to main content

Reflectance pulse oximetry at the forehead of newborns: The influence of varying pressure on the probe

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
12 patents

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reflectance pulse oximetry at the forehead of newborns: The influence of varying pressure on the probe
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring, November 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02199702
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Carin M. Dassel, Reindert Graaff, Anneke Meijer, Willem G. Zijlstra, Jan G. Aarnoudse

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,542,164
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring
#15
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,816
of 29,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them