You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantitation ofAcidothermus cellulolyticus E1 endoglucanase andThermomonospora fusca E3 exoglucanase using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, September 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02933425 |
| Authors |
Rafael A. Nieves, Yat-Chen Chou, Michael E. Himmel, Steven R. Thomas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 17% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,560,078
of 23,061,402 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#544
of 2,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,099
of 24,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,061,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.