You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of confocal X-ray fluorescence (XRF) microscopy at the Cornell high energy synchrotron source
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00339-006-3513-4 |
| Authors |
A.R. Woll, J. Mass, C. Bisulca, R. Huang, D.H. Bilderback, S. Gruner, N. Gao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
| Researcher | 12 | 19% |
| Professor | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 19 | 31% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 13% |
| Engineering | 8 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing
#463
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,862
of 92,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.