↓ Skip to main content

Is a constant low-entropy process at the root of glycolytic oscillations?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Physics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is a constant low-entropy process at the root of glycolytic oscillations?
Published in
Journal of Biological Physics, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10867-018-9499-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henrik Seir Thoke, Lars F. Olsen, Lars Duelund, R. P. Stock, Thomas Heimburg, Luis A. Bagatolli

Abstract

We measured temporal oscillations in thermodynamic variables such as temperature, heat flux, and cellular volume in suspensions of non-dividing yeast cells which exhibit temporal glycolytic oscillations. Oscillations in these variables have the same frequency as oscillations in the activity of intracellular metabolites, suggesting strong coupling between them. These results can be interpreted in light of a recently proposed theoretical formalism in which isentropic thermodynamic systems can display coupled oscillations in all extensive and intensive variables, reminiscent of adiabatic waves. This interpretation suggests that oscillations may be a consequence of the requirement of living cells for a constant low-entropy state while simultaneously performing biochemical transformations, i.e., remaining metabolically active. This hypothesis, which is in line with the view of the cellular interior as a highly structured and near equilibrium system where energy inputs can be low and sustain regular oscillatory regimes, calls into question the notion that metabolic processes are essentially dissipative.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Chemistry 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,186,199
of 23,443,716 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Physics
#53
of 302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,261
of 331,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Physics
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,443,716 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 302 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.