↓ Skip to main content

De-qi, not psychological factors, determines the therapeutic efficacy of acupuncture treatment for primary dysmenorrhea

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De-qi, not psychological factors, determines the therapeutic efficacy of acupuncture treatment for primary dysmenorrhea
Published in
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11655-011-0857-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Xiong, Fang Liu, Ming-min Zhang, Wei Wang, Guang-ying Huang

Abstract

To study the impact of De-qi (, obtaining qi) and psychological factors on the efficacy of acupuncture treatment for primary dysmenorrhea, with an attempt to explore the relationship among De-qi, psychological factors, and clinical efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 33%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Researcher 8 5%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 34 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 38 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,849,327
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#135
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,936
of 135,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them