↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students’ Perspectives on the Engagement in Research

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine (Wolters Kluwer), July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students’ Perspectives on the Engagement in Research
Published in
Medicine (Wolters Kluwer), July 2015
DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000001089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cho Naing, Victor Nyunt Wai, Jo Durham, Maxine A. Whittaker, Ni Ni Win, Kyan Aung, Joon Wah Mak

Abstract

Engaging students in active learning lies at the center of effective higher education. In medical schools, students' engagement in learning and research has come under increasing attention. The objective of this study was to synthesize evidence on medical students' perspectives on the engagement in research. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis.Relevant studies were searched in electronic databases. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Overall, 14 observational studies (with 17 data sets) were included. In general, many studies did not use the same questionnaires and the outcome measurements were not consistently reported; these presented some difficulties in pooling the results. Whenever data permitted, we performed pooled analysis for the 4 education outcomes. A Bayesian meta-analytical approach was supplemented as a measure of uncertainty.A pooled analysis showed that 74% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.57%-11.07%; I: 95.2%) of those students who engaged in research (while at the medical school) had positive attitudes toward their research experiences, whereas 49.5% (95% CI: 36.4%-62.7%; I: 93.4%) had positive attitudes toward the study of medical sciences, 62.3% (95% CI: 46.7%-77.9%; I: 96.3%) had self-reported changes in their practices, and 64% (95% CI: 30.8%-96.6%; I: 98.5%) could have published their work. There was substantial heterogeneity among studies. We acknowledged the caveats and the merit of the current review.Findings showed that engagement in research resulted in favorable reactions toward research and academic learning. Future well-designed studies using standardized research tools on how to engage students in research are recommended.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 21%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 27 25%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 46%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 26 24%