You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why are there no really big bony fishes? A point-of-view on maximum body size in teleosts and elasmobranchs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, December 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1025365210414 |
| Authors |
Jonathan A. Freedman, David L.G. Noakes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 144 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Professor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,253,204
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#53
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,025
of 135,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them