↓ Skip to main content

Best Practices for Extractables and Leachables in Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products: An Overview of the PQRI Recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
18 patents

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best Practices for Extractables and Leachables in Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products: An Overview of the PQRI Recommendations
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11095-007-9521-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel L. Norwood, Diane Paskiet, Michael Ruberto, Thomas Feinberg, Alan Schroeder, Guirag Poochikian, Qingxi Wang, Tian Jing Deng, Fran DeGrazio, Melinda K. Munos, Lee M. Nagao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 21%
Other 15 14%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 33 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 21 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 35 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,355,273
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#232
of 2,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,131
of 158,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.