You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plant–plant interactions could limit recruitment and range expansion of tall shrubs into alpine and Arctic tundra
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Polar Biology, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00300-018-2355-9 |
| Authors |
Sandra Angers-Blondin, Isla H. Myers-Smith, Stéphane Boudreau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 57% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,433,028
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#451
of 1,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,246
of 328,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.