↓ Skip to main content

Management of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: an evidence-based update

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Management of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: an evidence-based update
Published in
Advances in Therapy, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12325-010-0089-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad A. Aref, Ingrid U. Scott

Abstract

Retinal vein occlusions are common retinal vascular disorders with the potential for significant vision-related morbidity. Retinal vein occlusions are classified as either branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) based on the specific occlusion site. The most common cause of decreased vision in patients afflicted with BRVO is the accumulation of fluid within the macula (macular edema). The Branch Vein Occlusion Study (BVOS) demonstrated the efficacy of grid laser photocoagulation in the treatment of BRVO-related macular edema. After publication of that report, grid laser became the standard of care for decreased vision due to BRVO-associated macular edema in patients similar to those enrolled in the BVOS. However, several recent major randomized, controlled clinical trials have investigated new therapeutic modalities for the treatment of decreased vision due to macular edema secondary to BRVO. This article aims to provide insight into current evidence-based approaches to management of macular edema secondary to BRVO. A companion article reviews approaches for management of macular edema secondary to CRVO.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Master 8 19%
Other 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 26%