↓ Skip to main content

A comparative study of anhedonia components between major depression and schizophrenia in Chinese populations

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of General Psychiatry, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative study of anhedonia components between major depression and schizophrenia in Chinese populations
Published in
Annals of General Psychiatry, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12991-015-0061-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yinghui Li, Xiaodong Mou, Wenhao Jiang, Zhong Yang, Xinhua Shen, Zhuma Jin, Zhiping Dai, Yuju Liu, Shengqin Mao, Jian Zhang, Yonggui Yuan

Abstract

Anhedonia is a prominent symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia. At present, it is believed that hedonic processing rather consists of the anticipatory and consummatory phase. The aim of this research is to explore the different anhedonia components in MDD and schizophrenia in Chinese populations. A Chinese version of the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) was used to evaluate 176 MDD patients, 346 schizophrenia patients, and 268 healthy controls. Additionally, the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) was used for MDD patients, while the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was applied for schizophrenia. The scores of consummatory (TEPS-CON) and anticipatory pleasure (TEPS-ANT) in MDD and schizophrenia were both significantly lower than healthy controls (both P < 0.001). TEPS-CON and TEPS-ANT were negatively correlated with the score of HAMD-17, the duration of illness and admission times in MDD (P < 0.05 or 0.01). TEPS-CON was negatively related to PANSS total scores and negative symptoms (P < 0.05 or 0.01), but no significant correlation was found with duration of illness and admission times in schizophrenia (P > 0.05). There was no significant correlation between TEPS-ANT and any clinical variables (P > 0.05). The consummatory and anticipatory pleasures were both impaired in MDD and schizophrenia. Consummatory and anticipatory anhedonia can be considered as a "state" in MDD, but as a "trait" in schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Puerto Rico 1 2%
Nigeria 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 21%
Psychology 10 19%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,880,816
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#413
of 567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,927
of 277,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.