↓ Skip to main content

Human papillomavirus vaccination of the daughters of obstetricians and gynecologists in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 979)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1231 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human papillomavirus vaccination of the daughters of obstetricians and gynecologists in Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10147-015-0869-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomomi Egawa-Takata, Yutaka Ueda, Akiko Morimoto, Yusuke Tanaka, Shinya Matsuzaki, Eiji Kobayashi, Kiyoshi Yoshino, Masayuki Sekine, Takayuki Enomoto, Tadashi Kimura

Abstract

Most adolescents in Japan have recently been refraining from receiving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, following media reports of adverse medical events surrounding the vaccination and suspension of the Japanese governmental recommendation. We have previously reported that HPV vaccination of young girls is heavily influenced by guidance from their physicians concerning the vaccine and by the knowledge and attitude of the girls' mothers towards cervical cancer. However, it has been unclear as to how the obstetricians and gynecologists were themselves affected by the negative media reports. A questionnaire, including questions about their working status, attitudes toward HPV vaccination and about cervical cancer, and the HPV vaccination status of their daughters, was posted to obstetricians and gynecologists. None of the daughters of the responding obstetrician and gynecologists received the HPV vaccination after the announced suspension of the governmental recommendation for the vaccine. The number who received the HPV vaccine in the 6th to 9th grade in 2014 was significantly lower than those in 2012 (p = 0.012). However, 64.7 % of the responders whose daughters were eligible and in the 6th to 12th grade still intended to vaccinate their daughters in the future. Of the responders, 65 % also intended to recommend vaccination to their teenage patients. Our study revealed that obstetricians and gynecologists, like the general population, were negatively influenced by media reports of the adverse effect of the HPV vaccine and the suspension of the governmental recommendation. However, their intention to vaccinate their daughters was much higher than that of the general population. Restart of the governmental recommendation for HPV vaccines and better education about the HPV vaccine, including its adverse effects, and about cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening, are strongly recommended, for both the general public and for doctors, for improved prevention of cervical cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,231 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 19 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 607. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#38,159
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#1
of 979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302
of 276,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 979 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them