↓ Skip to main content

Rationale and cross-sectional study design of the Research on Obesity and type 2 Diabetes among African Migrants: the RODAM study

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationale and cross-sectional study design of the Research on Obesity and type 2 Diabetes among African Migrants: the RODAM study
Published in
BMJ Open, March 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004877
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles Agyemang, Erik Beune, Karlijn Meeks, Ellis Owusu-Dabo, Peter Agyei-Baffour, Ama de-Graft Aikins, Francis Dodoo, Liam Smeeth, Juliet Addo, Frank P Mockenhaupt, Stephen K Amoah, Matthias B Schulze, Ina Danquah, Joachim Spranger, Mary Nicolaou, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, Tom Burr, Peter Henneman, Marcel M Mannens, Jan P van Straalen, Silver Bahendeka, A H Zwinderman, Anton E Kunst, Karien Stronks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 193 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 17%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 30%
Social Sciences 18 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Psychology 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 56 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#11,904
of 25,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,384
of 237,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#142
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.