↓ Skip to main content

TRPs and pain

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Immunopathology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TRPs and pain
Published in
Seminars in Immunopathology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00281-015-0526-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Dai

Abstract

Nociception is the process of transmission of painful signals by nociceptors in the primary afferent nerve fibers, which specifically respond to noxious stimuli. These noxious stimuli are detected by nociceptors and converted into electrical signals, which are then transmitted to the spinal cord, thalamus, and the cerebral cortex, where pain is finally sensed. Transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels have emerged as a family of evolutionarily conserved ligand-gated ion channels that function as molecular detectors of physical stimuli. Several member of this family, at least six channels from three TRP family subtypes (TRPV1-4, TRPM8, and TRPA1), are expressed in nociceptors, where they act as transducers for signals from thermal, chemical, and mechanical stimuli and play crucial roles in the generation and development of pathological pain perception. This review focuses on the increasing evidence of TRP channel involvement and contribution in nociceptive pain and the pain hypersensitivity associated with peripheral inflammation or neuropathy, and on the renewed interest in targeting TRP channels for pain relief.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 188 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Student > Bachelor 31 16%
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 39 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 14%
Neuroscience 25 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 48 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,773,420
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Immunopathology
#414
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,250
of 268,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Immunopathology
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.