You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disaggregating ethnoracial disparities in physician trust
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Science Research, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.06.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abigail A. Sewell |
| Abstract |
Past research yields mixed evidence regarding whether ethnoracial minorities trust physicians less than Whites. Using the 2002 and 2006 General Social Surveys, variegated ethnoracial differences in trust in physicians are identified by disaggregating a multidimensional physician trust scale. Compared to Whites, Blacks are less likely to trust the technical judgment and interpersonal competence of doctors. Latinos are less likely than Whites to trust the fiduciary ethic, technical judgment, and interpersonal competence of doctors. Black-Latino differences in physician trust are a function of ethnoracial differences in parental nativity. The ways ethnoracial hierarchies are inscribed into power-imbalanced clinical exchanges are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 54% |
| Liechtenstein | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 24% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Psychology | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 594. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#39,110
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Social Science Research
#4
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312
of 278,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science Research
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.