You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Low-diversity fungal assemblage in an Antarctic Dry Valleys soil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Polar Biology, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00300-011-1102-2 |
Authors |
Subramanya Rao, Yuki Chan, Donnabella C. Lacap, Kevin D. Hyde, Stephen B. Pointing, Roberta L. Farrell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 48% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 10% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,632,891
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#262
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,360
of 131,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.