↓ Skip to main content

Understanding and Overcoming the Sticking Point in Resistance Exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding and Overcoming the Sticking Point in Resistance Exercise
Published in
Sports Medicine, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40279-015-0460-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin Kompf, Ognjen Arandjelović

Abstract

In the context of resistance training the so-called "sticking point" is commonly understood as the position in a lift in which a disproportionately large increase in the difficulty to continue the lift is experienced. If the lift is taken to the point of momentary muscular failure, the sticking point is usually where the failure occurs. Hence the sticking point is associated with an increased chance of exercise form deterioration or breakdown. Understanding the mechanisms that lead to the occurrence of sticking points as well as different training strategies that can be used to overcome them is important to strength practitioners (trainees and coaches alike) and instrumental for the avoidance of injury and continued progress. In this article we survey and consolidate the body of existing research on the topic: we discuss different definitions of the sticking point adopted in the literature and propose a more precise definition, describe different muscular and biomechanical aspects that give rise to sticking points, and review the effectiveness of different training modalities used to address them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 195 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Student > Master 26 13%
Researcher 11 6%
Professor 11 6%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 55 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 89 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 61 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,366,580
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,117
of 2,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,454
of 402,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#32
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.