↓ Skip to main content

The First5 Concept

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The First5 Concept
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 2011
DOI 10.3399/bjgp11x549135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare Taylor, James Parsons, Nigel Sparrow, Clare Gerada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 30%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 80%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#18,653,753
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,852
of 4,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,672
of 182,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#30
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.