↓ Skip to main content

Statistical analysis plan for a cluster-randomized crossover trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a flexible family visitation model for delirium prevention in adult intensive care units (th…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical analysis plan for a cluster-randomized crossover trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a flexible family visitation model for delirium prevention in adult intensive care units (the ICU Visits Study)
Published in
Trials, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-3006-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Sganzerla, Cassiano Teixeira, Caroline Cabral Robinson, Renata Kochhann, Mariana Martins Siqueira Santos, Rafaela Moraes de Moura, Mirceli Goulart Barbosa, Daiana Barbosa da Silva, Tarissa Ribeiro, Cláudia Eugênio, Daniel Schneider, Débora Mariani, Rodrigo Wiltgen Jeffman, Fernando Bozza, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Jorge Ibrain Salluh, José Augusto Santos Pellegrini, Rafael Barberena Moraes, Lucas Petri Damiani, Nilton Brandão da Silva, Maicon Falavigna, Regis Goulart Rosa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 52 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 19%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 52 41%