You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Contamination in sediments, bivalves and sponges of McMurdo Sound, Antarctica
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Pollution, February 2006
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.12.005 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew Negri, Kathryn Burns, Steve Boyle, Diane Brinkman, Nicole Webster |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Croatia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 122 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 35% |
Environmental Science | 35 | 27% |
Chemistry | 11 | 9% |
Engineering | 6 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,846,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Pollution
#1,132
of 13,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,301
of 91,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Pollution
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.