↓ Skip to main content

Polymorphisms in the vascular endothelial growth factor gene and the risk of familial endometriosis

Overview of attention for article published in MHR : Basic Science of Reproductive Medicine, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polymorphisms in the vascular endothelial growth factor gene and the risk of familial endometriosis
Published in
MHR : Basic Science of Reproductive Medicine, July 2008
DOI 10.1093/molehr/gan043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhen Zhen Zhao, Dale R. Nyholt, Shane Thomas, Susan A. Treloar, Grant W. Montgomery

Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an endothelial cell-specific angiogenic protein suspected to be involved in the pathogenesis of endometriosis by establishing a new blood supply to the human exfoliated endometrium. Several transcription factor-binding sites are found in the VEGF 5'-untranslated region and variation within the region increases the transcriptional activity. Six previous studies which tested between one and three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in samples comprising 105-215 cases and 100-219 controls have produced conflicting evidence for association between the SNPs in the VEGF region and endometriosis. To further investigate the reported association between VEGF variants and endometriosis, we tested the four VEGF polymorphisms (-2578 A/C, rs699947; -460 T/C, rs833061; +405 G/C, rs2010963 and +936 C/T, rs3025039) in a large Australian sample of 958 familial endometriosis cases and 959 controls. We also conducted a literature-based review of all relevant association studies of these VEGF SNPs in endometriosis and performed a meta-analysis. There was no evidence for association between endometriosis and the VEGF polymorphisms genotyped in our study. Combined association results from a meta-analysis did not provide any evidence for either genotypic or allelic association with endometriosis. Our detailed review and meta-analysis of the VEGF polymorphisms suggests that genotyping assay problems may underlie the previously reported associations between VEGF variants and endometriosis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 4%
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Lecturer 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from MHR : Basic Science of Reproductive Medicine
#288
of 1,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,612
of 97,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MHR : Basic Science of Reproductive Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them