You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Outcomes used in randomised controlled trials of nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2303-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Garry Taverny, Thomas Lescot, Emmanuel Pardo, Frederique Thonon, Manar Maarouf, Corinne Alberti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 22% |
| United States | 6 | 12% |
| South Africa | 4 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 32% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 26% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,395,733
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,215
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,581
of 446,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#22
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.