You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to evaluate a monitoring system for adaptive policies: criteria for signposts selection and their model-based evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-018-2355-3 |
| Authors |
Luciano Raso, Jan Kwakkel, Jos Timmermans, Geremy Panthou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 19% |
| Decision Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,588,635
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,310
of 5,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,748
of 438,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#51
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.