↓ Skip to main content

Activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma have depot-specific effects on human preadipocyte differentiation.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, December 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma have depot-specific effects on human preadipocyte differentiation.
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, December 1997
DOI 10.1172/jci119870
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Adams, C T Montague, J B Prins, J C Holder, S A Smith, L Sanders, J E Digby, C P Sewter, M A Lazar, V K Chatterjee, S O'Rahilly

Abstract

Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma, a nuclear receptor highly expressed in adipocytes, induces the differentiation of murine preadipocyte cell lines. Recently, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), a novel class of insulin-sensitizing compounds effective in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) have been shown to bind to PPARgamma with high affinity. We have examined the effects of these compounds on the differentiation of human preadipocytes derived from subcutaneous (SC) and omental (Om) fat. Assessed by lipid accumulation, glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity, and mRNA levels, subcultured preadipocytes isolated from either SC or Om depots did not differentiate in defined serum-free medium. Addition of TZDs (BRL49653 or troglitazone) or 15-deoxyDelta12,14prostaglandin J2 (a natural PPARgamma ligand) enhanced markedly the differentiation of preadipocytes from SC sites, assessed by all three criteria. The rank order of potency of these agents in inducing differentiation matched their ability to activate transcription via human PPARgamma. In contrast, preadipocytes from Om sites in the same individuals were refractory to TZDs, although PPARgamma was expressed at similar levels in both depots. The mechanism of this depot-specific TZD response is unknown. However, given the association between Om adiposity and NIDDM, the site-specific responsiveness of human preadipocytes to TZDs may be involved in the beneficial effects of these compounds on in vivo insulin sensitivity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Professor 7 7%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2016.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#6,698
of 17,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,006
of 94,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#30
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.