You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of two soft chemistry routes for the synthesis of mesoporous carbon/β-SiC nanocomposites
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-013-7222-z |
| Authors |
Xavier Deschanels, Damien Hérault, Guilhem Arrachart, Cyrielle Rey, Agnès Grandjean, Guillaume Toquer, Renaud Podor, Thomas Zemb, Geneviève Cerveau, Robert Corriu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 24% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 24% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,183,555
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#241
of 4,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,810
of 191,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,613 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.