↓ Skip to main content

The superficial elevated and depressed lesion type is an independent factor associated with non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The superficial elevated and depressed lesion type is an independent factor associated with non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00464-016-4825-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshiko Ohara, Nobuyuki Toshikuni, Kazuhiro Matsueda, Hirokazu Mouri, Hiroshi Yamamoto

Abstract

The expanded criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) have led to an increase in the number of EGC patients who receive curative treatment involving endoscopic techniques. Identifying the factors that are associated with treatment outcomes would be helpful in the application of ESD for EGC. Potential factors associated with incomplete ESD and with non-curative ESD were investigated using a multiple logistic regression model in EGC patients who consecutively underwent ESD according to the expanded criteria. A total of 363 patients with 398 EGC lesions were enrolled. The rates of complete ESD and curative ESD were 96.2 % (383/398) and 85.7 % (341/398), respectively. No significant factors associated with incomplete ESD were identified. In contrast, a tumor size >20 mm [odds ratio (OR) 3.31; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.74-6.29], the superficial elevated and depressed type (0-IIa + IIc or IIc + IIa) (OR 4.37; 95 % CI 1.88-9.88), and the undifferentiated type (OR 5.93; 95 % CI 1.65-19.41) were identified as independent factors associated with non-curative ESD. The superficial elevated and depressed type in particular was found to be highly related to submucosal and lymphovascular invasion. The rate of non-curative ESD in cases of this macroscopic type occurring together with a tumor size >20 mm was 58.3 %, and the adjusted OR was 16.48 (95 % CI 4.69-62.09). The results suggest that the superficial elevated and depressed type is an independent factor associated with non-curative ESD and that the risk of non-curative ESD is increased when this macroscopic type is present along with a large tumor size.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 54%
Psychology 1 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,444,553
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,760
of 6,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,892
of 298,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#73
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,044 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.