You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic Big Data and Privacy: Challenges and Opportunities for Precision Medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10606-016-9248-7 |
| Authors |
Julie Frizzo-Barker, Peter A. Chow-White, Anita Charters, Dung Ha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 17 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,279,808
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#33
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,296
of 313,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.