↓ Skip to main content

Robotic simulation training for urological trainees: a comprehensive review on cost, merits and challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Robotic Surgery, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 693)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robotic simulation training for urological trainees: a comprehensive review on cost, merits and challenges
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11701-019-00934-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eoin MacCraith, James C. Forde, Niall F. Davis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 32%
Engineering 6 7%
Computer Science 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 40 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,212,808
of 23,337,345 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Robotic Surgery
#44
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,232
of 353,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Robotic Surgery
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,337,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.