↓ Skip to main content

When Is It Better to Learn Together? Insights from Research on Collaborative Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Is It Better to Learn Together? Insights from Research on Collaborative Learning
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8
Authors

Timothy J. Nokes-Malach, J. Elizabeth Richey, Soniya Gadgil

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 374 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 11%
Researcher 39 10%
Lecturer 32 8%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 98 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 90 23%
Psychology 50 13%
Arts and Humanities 18 5%
Computer Science 16 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 4%
Other 83 22%
Unknown 113 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,310,410
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#372
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,991
of 272,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.