You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reason for Revision Influences Early Patient Outcomes After Aseptic Knee Revision
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2278-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Baker, Paul Cowling, Steven Kurtz, Simon Jameson, Paul Gregg, David Deehan |
| Abstract |
Revision TKA less consistently produces improvements in clinical function and quality of life when compared with primary TKA. The reasons for this difference are unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,326,750
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,986
of 7,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,341
of 169,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#15
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.