↓ Skip to main content

Salivary Cortisol Reactivity in Preterm Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care: An Integrative Review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Salivary Cortisol Reactivity in Preterm Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care: An Integrative Review
Published in
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, March 2016
DOI 10.3390/ijerph13030337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evalotte Mörelius, Hong-Gu He, Shefaly Shorey

Abstract

Recently, more and more researchers have been using salivary cortisol reactivity to evaluate stress in preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The aim of this integrative literature review was to summarize the evidence of interventions leading to a change in salivary cortisol from the baseline in preterm infants in the NICU. The electronic databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for relevant studies. The inclusion criteria were studies with preterm infants exposed to an intervention evaluated by salivary cortisol reactivity before discharge from the NICU, which were published in English. In total, 16 studies were included. Eye-screening examination and heel lance provoked an increase in the salivary cortisol level. Music, prone position, and co-bedding among twins decreased the salivary cortisol level. Several studies reported a low rate of successful saliva sampling or did not use control groups. Future studies need to focus on non-painful interventions in order to learn more about salivary cortisol regulation in preterm infants. Moreover, these studies should use study designs comprising homogenous gestational and postnatal age groups, control groups, and reliable analysis methods that are able to detect cortisol in small amounts of saliva.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 38 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 18%
Psychology 22 13%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#20,025
of 31,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,581
of 315,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#118
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.