You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reserve design to optimize functional connectivity and animal density
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Biology, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1111/cobi.13369 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amrita Gupta, Bistra Dilkina, Dana J. Morin, Angela K. Fuller, J. Andrew Royle, Christopher Sutherland, Carla P. Gomes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
United States | 2 | 9% |
Chile | 2 | 9% |
Australia | 2 | 9% |
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Portugal | 1 | 4% |
Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
Scientists | 10 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 24% |
Researcher | 15 | 18% |
Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 34% |
Environmental Science | 24 | 29% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,852,211
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,042
of 4,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,208
of 361,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#23
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.