↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Findings and Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Extraprostatic Extension Identified on Prostate Biopsy

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 114)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Findings and Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Extraprostatic Extension Identified on Prostate Biopsy
Published in
The Journal of Urology, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Fleshner, Melissa Assel, Nicole Benfante, Justin Lee, Andrew Vickers, Samson Fine, Sigrid Carlsson, James Eastham

Abstract

To describe the histopathological, clinical and imaging findings among men with extraprostatic extension (EPE) on prostate biopsy. We searched our Institutional Pathology Database, between the years 2004-2015, for pathology reports detailing EPE on prostate biopsy in untreated patients. Patient characteristics, biopsy features, imaging interpretations and outcomes were examined. Of 19,950 patients with prostate cancer on biopsy, 112 had EPE, a prevalence of 0.6% (95% CI 0.5%-0.7%). Most patients had palpable, high-grade (Gleason score 9), high-volume, disease classified as high-risk (30%; 34/112), locally advanced (15%; 17/112), or metastatic (35%; 39/112). Most had one or two cores with EPE, typically at the base and with concomitant perineural invasion. EPE was identified by MRI in 80% (32/40). The median follow-up for those who did not die was 1.3 years (IQR 0.3, 4.2). Outcomes for the subgroup of 24 men who had an RP were consistent with high risk disease: positive margins (58%; 14/24), SVI (42%; 10/24), and LNI (46%; 11/24). For the entire cohort, the 3-year risks of metastasis and overall mortality were 32% (95% CI 22%, 44%) and 37% (95% CI 27%, 50%), respectively. We did not find evidence to suggest that the proportion of cores with cancer that also had EPE was associated with overall mortality (p=0.09). EPE is a rare finding on prostate biopsy. It is strongly associated with other features of aggressive prostate cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 50%
Engineering 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,415,371
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#10
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,416
of 315,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.